Resources
Facility condition assessment (FCA) and the facility condition index
A facility condition assessment (FCA) is an inspection of a building and its systems that records what needs repair or replacement and what fixing it is estimated to cost, so the owner can plan maintenance and capital work. The facility condition index (FCI) boils that down to one ratio: the cost of the deficiencies divided by what it would cost to replace the building, where lower means better condition. Below: what an FCA covers, how the index is worked out, and how an FCA differs from a property condition assessment.
Request a quoteCall (408) 668-0624
What a facility condition assessment covers
An FCA looks at the whole building, system by system, and turns what it finds into a costed list of work. Federal real property guidance defines a condition assessment as a physical inspection that analyzes an asset’s condition to find needed repairs and estimate their cost. APPA’s Body of Knowledge adds that the aim is to measure both condition and functionality and to guide choices such as renovation or modernization.
It lists the purposes of an assessment as:
- Inspecting the facilities
- Defining regular maintenance, capital renewal and replacement projects
- Removing damaging or hazardous conditions
- Finding energy conservation options
- Taking an accessibility inventory
- Producing cost estimates and schedules
Inspectors cover architectural, civil and structural, electrical, mechanical and safety components, often filed under the NIST UNIFORMAT II classification so results compare across sites. Its top groups run from the substructure and shell (structure, exterior walls, roofing) through interiors and building services (conveying, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection, electrical) to equipment and furnishings, special construction and sitework. An assessment can be comprehensive, limited to one functional area or a few subsystems, or aimed at a new safety or regulatory rule.
How an assessment is carried out
APPA describes four phases:
- Design the assessment: scope, team and inspection plan.
- Collect the data: inspection forms, functionality criteria, field inspections and interviews.
- Summarize the results and set priorities.
- Present the findings and put the assessment to work.
Inputs include space inventories, drawings, field inspections, staff observations, maintenance records, feasibility studies and reviews of proposed capital projects, often kept in a relational database. Some owners rely on detailed inspections; others forecast capital renewal needs with a life-cycle model looking at least ten years ahead, or combine the two. APPA cautions that a model cannot be the core data source unless inspections verify at least 10 percent of the facilities, and it recommends inspection teams of two or more for safety and communication.
Federal agencies have a similar choice: they may estimate repair needs through condition assessments or through parametric models built from cost relationships, sometimes set from a visual inspection or from system age and repair cost data.
Who performs an FCA
In-house staff, outside consultants or a mix can do the work, per APPA. In-house staff know the buildings and the maintenance history but need formal training as part-time inspectors. Consultants bring timely, impartial and specialized work but need a carefully defined scope and monitoring. The people who use the results are senior administrators, governing boards, facility managers and specialists such as consulting architects and engineers.
What the report gives you
A finished FCA hands the owner a ranked to-do list with prices attached. Typical outputs are:
- Deficiency findings with the remedial action for each
- Project lists with a priority level and cost estimate per project; APPA’s sample table shows building, project description, gross square feet, building type, cost estimate, priority and an index value
- Cost estimates and schedules for maintenance, capital renewal and replacement
- A final report and presentation
In APPA’s framing, critical deficiencies are corrected within 12 to 24 months and future capital renewal projects are ranked over two to five years. A more detailed FCA replaces generic condition ratings with cost projections for resolving each deficiency, which is what makes the list usable for a capital budget.
The facility condition index: how it is calculated
The FCI is a ratio: deficiency cost divided by current replacement value. APPA defines it as the deferred maintenance backlog over current asset replacement value and calls it the most commonly used facilities indicator. The National Park Service’s Denver Service Center describes it as a simple point-in-time measure of relative condition: the value of all deficiencies divided by current replacement value.
There is no single FCI scale. The bands below are the Park Service’s, as published on its definitions page (last updated August 2026):
| NPS FCI | Rating |
|---|---|
| Under .10 | Good |
| .11 to .14 | Fair |
| .15 to .49 | Poor |
| Over .50 | Serious: consider stabilization or restoration for heritage assets, replacement for others |
APPA also describes a Facility Quality Index (FQI), which adds the cost of functionality upgrades to the maintenance backlog before dividing, so it can run past the building’s replacement value.
The federal condition index
Federal agencies report a Condition Index (CI) instead, where higher is better. Under the Federal Real Property Council’s 2026 guidance (issued June 2, 2026), the CI is computed automatically as [1 – (repair needs / replacement value)] x 100, and a negative result is allowed.
| FRPC 2026 CI | Rating |
|---|---|
| 95 and above | Excellent |
| 90 to 94.99 | Good |
| 70 to 89.99 | Fair |
| Below 70 | Poor |
Repair needs are the one-time costs to bring an asset back to its originally intended capacity, efficiency or capability. They include deferred maintenance, leave out work that adds capacity beyond the original design, and are reported whether or not the work will be done. Replacement value is the cost to design and build a replacement of the same function and size in the same place at current costs, codes and standards, excluding land, site preparation, earthworks and landscaping. Both are restated in current-year dollars every year.
Worked example: one building, two scales
The figures below are made up to show the arithmetic; they come from no real building. By our calculation from the NPS and FRPC formulas, the federal CI equals (1 – FCI) x 100 when both use repair needs over replacement value.
| Example | Repair needs | Replacement value | FCI (NPS rating) | CI (FRPC rating) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building A | $250,000 | $10,000,000 | 0.025 (Good) | 97.5 (Excellent) |
| Building A, larger backlog | $2,000,000 | $10,000,000 | 0.20 (Poor) | 80 (Fair) |
The second row shows why every FCI figure needs its method named: the same building reads “poor” on one scale and “fair” on the other.
FCA vs PCA: two assessments, two jobs
A property condition assessment (PCA) supports a transaction; an FCA supports an owner’s long-term planning. ASTM E2018-24, the Standard Guide for Property Condition Assessments, sets out a baseline PCA for commercial real estate: a walk-through survey by a field observer, document review, research and interviews, and a written Property Condition Report (PCR) with opinions of cost for remedying the physical deficiencies observed. ASTM describes the guide as voluntary, says it carries a moderate level of uncertainty and does not prescribe a scope of work.
| PCA (ASTM E2018-24) | FCA (APPA method) | |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Due diligence for parties to a commercial real estate transaction | Ongoing maintenance, capital renewal and replacement planning |
| Timing | One point in time | Repeated on a cycle |
| Depth | Baseline walk-through, document review and interviews | Physical condition plus functionality, with optional life-cycle forecasting of at least ten years |
| Output | A PCR with opinions of cost for observed deficiencies | Deficiency data, ranked project lists, cost estimates, schedules and index values such as the FCI |
A PCR covers every primary improvement on the property in one report, is relied on only for the date of the walk-through and is site-specific. The guide lists its out-of-scope items separately, and widening the assessment to cover them is the user’s call.
When a buyer or lender orders a PCA
In a purchase or refinance, the PCA serves the loan as much as the buyer. Freddie Mac’s guide (Chapter 62, Guide Bulletin Update 08/25/26) has the lender retain and direct the consultant, though the borrower may pay. ASTM’s product page frames E2018-24 as a way to find a commercial property’s material physical deficiencies and report them to the user.
Each lender sets its own clock. For a Fannie Mae multifamily loan (Guide effective October 26, 2026), a report without a High Performance Building module may be up to 12 months old if a site visit falls within 90 days before the commitment date and nothing material has worsened. Freddie Mac wants the report dated within six months before the underwriting package and the inspection within 30 days before the report date; its consultant walks every commercial unit, at least 10 percent of residential units, and roofs, structure, systems and signs of water or mold.
Fannie Mae’s immediate repairs go on the loan’s Completion/Repair Schedule, while Freddie Mac sets replacement reserves from capital needs projected over the loan term plus two years. Freddie Mac counts deferred maintenance over $3,000 per repair item as a Priority Repair.
Buyers read that list against the closing date: what to ask the seller to fix or credit, and what carries a lender deadline after closing. The purchase agreement and the lender decide each item; our acquisition due diligence guide covers the service contracts. Our part is cleaning and upkeep: reachable, tidy mechanical rooms and sample units before the site visit, and crews after closing who report on the PCA’s routine items.
How often owners repeat an FCA
APPA recommends repeating the assessment every three years, more often for unusual or heavily used facilities, with a comprehensive baseline allowing rolling updates. The FRPC’s 2026 guidance has federal agencies that rely on condition assessments assess each facility at least once every five years, and update repair-need estimates every year. APPA’s broader point is that condition assessment works best as an ongoing habit of spotting and reporting deficiencies, not a one-time event.
Where cleaning and routine upkeep fit
Clean floors do not lower an FCI. In federal reporting, cleaning is an operations cost rather than a repair need, so it sits outside the index. What day-to-day crews add is information: APPA lists staff observations and maintenance records among an assessment’s data sources, and its phases include interviews about functional problems. A cracked tile, a stained ceiling tile or a dripping fixture logged on a cleaning round becomes one of those staff observations.
California’s public K-12 schools are one place where cleanliness gets its own rating. The state’s Facility Inspection Tool (FIT, rev. 04/22), from the Office of Public School Construction, judges whether a school is in good repair, meaning clean, safe and functional. Its Overall Cleanliness section rates an area deficient if it looks uncleaned for two weeks, and its optional 15-item cleanliness worksheet rates an area clean at 75 percent or more “yes” answers. The FIT applies to public schools only, and districts may use a local tool that meets the same criteria. Our school and daycare cleaning page covers the crew side of that work.
Get help
An FCA plans the big repairs; the recurring care keeps small problems from joining the backlog. Use our building maintenance checklist generator for routine inspections and service visits, see our facility maintenance service for light repairs on a schedule, and request a walkthrough of your property.
A few useful answers
Common questions
What is a good facility condition index?
On the National Park Service’s scale, an FCI under .10 is good, .11 to .14 is fair, .15 to .49 is poor and over .50 is serious. Federal agencies use a Condition Index instead, where 95 and above is excellent.
How is the facility condition index calculated?
Divide the cost of the building’s deficiencies, or its deferred maintenance backlog, by its current replacement value. A building with a 250,000 dollar backlog and a 10 million dollar replacement value, an illustrative example, has an FCI of 0.025.
What is the difference between an FCA and a PCA?
A PCA under ASTM E2018-24 is a point-in-time due diligence report for a commercial real estate transaction. An FCA is repeated on a cycle to plan maintenance, capital renewal and replacement, and adds a functionality assessment and index values such as the FCI.
How often should a facility condition assessment be repeated?
APPA’s guidance is every three years, more often for unique or heavily used facilities. Federal agencies that use condition assessments must assess each facility at least once every five years under the FRPC’s 2026 guidance.
Is ASTM E2018 mandatory?
ASTM describes E2018-24 as a guide for voluntary use. It sets out a baseline process and leaves the scope of due diligence to the user’s objectives, risk tolerance, schedule and budget.
Does cleaning affect a building’s FCI?
Not directly. In federal reporting, cleaning is an operations cost rather than a repair need, so it sits outside the index. Cleaning crews’ notes on damaged finishes or leaks can still feed the assessment as staff observations.
Who hires the PCA consultant on a Freddie Mac loan?
The lender does. Freddie Mac’s Chapter 62 (Guide Bulletin Update 08/25/26) has the lender retain and direct the consultant; the borrower may pay for the report but does not hire the consultant, and the consultant cannot be affiliated with the borrower, lender, buyer or seller or be hired to do the repairs the report lists.